THINKING SYSTEMS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF VALUE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v10i1.11357Abstract
Systemic thinking is a way of thinking that looks at events in order from the simplest to the most complex. Examples of systemic thinking, for example, recognize the process of human formation starting from the womb, birth, childhood, becoming an adult, until death. While looking at human development itself is influenced by various factors, such as the social environment, family, and the food eaten; all are examples of systems thinking. The method used to obtain the data needed in this discussion is the Library Research method. The result is that ethical values are intended for humans only, other than humans (animals, objects, nature) do not contain ethical values, therefore it is impossible to be punished for good or bad, wrong or right. While aesthetics is more inclined to beauty and art that is seen by the eye. The schools in value are materialism, hedonism, utilitarianism, intuition, evolution and naturalism. From some of these schools there are similarities in looking at the good and bad of a life, but this school also has different views about the good and bad of a life. But in Islamic teachings to say his life is good or bad it can be seen from the revelations of Allah SWT listed in the holy book of the Qur'an.References
Anwar, S. S. (2021). Aliran dan Pemikiran Filsafat Pendidikan. Yayasan Para Doa Wali.
Aprita, S. (2020). Etika Profesi. Qiara Media.
Arif, O. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Filsafat Timur dan Barat. Gentanusantara. Bertens, K. (1993). Etika. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hidayat, R. (2015). Implementasi Berpikir Sistem Dalam Manajemen Pendidikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Implementasi Manajemen Mutu Dalam Pendidikan Indonesia Di Era Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean Unma Banten, 269-277.
Ibrahim, M. S. &. (2013). Asas-Asas Filsafat. Nagakusuma Media Kreatif. Ismail, F. (2021). Islam Dinamika Dialogis Keilmuan, Kebudayaan, dan
Kemanusiaan. IRCiSoD.
Kholil. (2018). Pendekatan Holistik dan Model Dinamik Untuk Masalah Yang Kompleks. Yayasan Komunikasi Pasca Tiga Belas.
Nazir, M. (1988). Metodologi Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Nizar, I. A. I. (2020). Membedah Pemikiran Filsafat VS Agama. Bintang Pustaka Madani.
Praja, J. S. (2020). Aliran-Aliran Filsafat dan Etika. Kencana.
Pratiwi, A. (2017). Bungan Rampai Kemitraan. Universitas Paramadina. Rakhmansyah, A. (2014). Studi dan Pengkajian Sastra. Graha Ilmu.
RI, D. A. (2015). Terjemahan Al-Qur'an. CV Darus Sunnah.
Rosadi, R. B. & K. I. (2020). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Berpikir Sistem: Aspek Internal Dan EksternaL. JEMSI, 2(2), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.31933/jemsi.v2i2
Susanto, A. (2019). Fisafat Ilmu. Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access
LICENSE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
