RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY IN VIRTUAL SPACE: SHIFTING LEGITIMACY OF ULAMA IN THE NEW MEDIA ECOSYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v15i1.28619Keywords:
religious authority, legitimacy of scholars, social media, platform algorithms, network societyAbstract
The development of the new media ecosystem has significantly transformed the production and recognition patterns of religious authority in Indonesia. Amidst the increasingly massive penetration of the internet and social media, the legitimacy of ulama (Islamic scholars) no longer rests solely on institutional credentials, scholarly chains of narration, and recognition from traditional communities, but is also shaped by digital visibility, communication performativity, and the logic of platform algorithms. This article aims to systematically analyze the shift in ulama legitimacy in the virtual space by exploring the relationship between platform structures, communication strategies of religious figures, and audience participation in constructing or delegitimizing authority. The research uses a qualitative approach with a digital case study and digital ethnography design. Data were collected through observations of da'wah content on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok, documentation of public interactions, and semi-structured interviews with religious figures and active followers. The analysis was conducted using thematic analysis with triangulation of sources and methods to ensure the credibility of the findings. The results indicate three main models of legitimacy: institutional-traditional, performative-digital, and hybrid, with the hybrid model proving more adaptive and stable in a networked society. Platform algorithms and audience participation play significant roles in shaping visibility and negotiating legitimacy. This study concludes that the shift in the legitimacy of ulama (ulama) is not the elimination of traditional authority, but rather a reconfiguration of social recognition mechanisms within the digital ecosystem. This implication underscores the importance of integrating scientific integrity and strategic digital literacy, and opens up opportunities for further research based on mixed-method approaches and social network analysis.References
APJII. (2024). Laporan survei penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia 2024. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.
Aziz, A. (2019). Otoritas keagamaan di era media sosial: Fragmentasi dan transformasi dakwah digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 9(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2019.9.2.155-172
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Campbell, H. A. (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. We Are Social & Meltwater.
Fakhruroji, M. (2017). Dakwah di era media baru: Teori dan aktivisme dakwah di internet. Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies, 11(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v11i2.1903
Hefni, W. (2020). Otoritas ulama dan media digital: Tantangan dan peluang dakwah kontemporer. Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 5(1), 45–60.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge.
Hoover, S. M. (2016). The media and religious authority. Penn State University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
Kholil, S. (2021). Legitimasi ulama dalam ruang publik digital: Analisis komunikasi keagamaan di media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2021.11.1.1-18
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mowlana, H. (2007). Global information and world communication: New frontiers in international relations (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nisa, E. F. (2018). Creative and lucrative da‘wa: The visual culture of Instagram amongst female Muslim youth in Indonesia. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1–2), 68–99. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340085
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE Publications.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.
Zaini, A. (2022). Transformasi dakwah dan otoritas keagamaan di era digital. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 14(2), 210–228.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access
LICENSE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
