LEGAL PROTECTION OF REGISTERED TRADEMARK OWNERS’ ECONOMIC RIGHTS AGAINST THE ALLEGED DISTRIBUTION OF COUNTERFEIT DANCOW MILK PRODUCTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v15i4.30683Keywords:
Registered Trademark, Economic Rights, Suspected counterfeit product, E-Commerce, MUI Fatwa.,Abstract
The circulation of suspected counterfeit Dancow-branded milk products through e-commerce platforms raises concerns regarding the protection of the economic rights of registered trademark owners in the digital marketplace. This study aims to analyze violations of trademark owners’ economic rights arising from the unauthorized use of registered trademarks and to examine the available civil legal remedies under Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, as well as from the perspective of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) Fatwa Number 1 of 2005 on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights. This research employs a normative-juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results indicate that the circulation of products suspected of bearing counterfeit Dancow trademarks may infringe the exclusive rights of registered trademark owners and potentially cause economic losses, including reduced commercial value, loss of business opportunities, and reputational harm. The Trademark Law provides civil remedies through claims for damages and requests to cease the circulation of infringing goods, supported by general provisions on unlawful acts and the legal responsibilities of e-commerce platform operators. From the perspective of Islamic law, the unauthorized use of another party’s trademark is prohibited because it violates the principles of justice and the protection of property rights. This study contributes to strengthening the legal protection of registered trademark owners’ economic rights by integrating positive law and Islamic law within the context of digital commerce.References
Agustina, R. (2003). Perbuatan melawan hukum. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Aidri, M. S., & Tarigan, T. M. (2026). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap pembeli pisang yang berlapis cat pilox perspektif maqashid syari’ah: Studi kasus di Kecamatan Martubung, Kota Medan. QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, 4(3), 1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i3.1271
Az-Zuhaili, W. (2006). Al-fiqh al-Islāmī wa adillatuh (Juz 4–5). Dar al-Fikr.
Ernanda, A. D. (2025). Efektivitas perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar dalam mencegah pemalsuan dan sengketa kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 13(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.24198/plr.v13i1.2213
Gultom, M. H. (2018). Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak merek terdaftar terhadap pelanggaran merek. Warta Dharmawangsa, (56). https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i56.14
Hasanah, A. N., Hasanah, U., & Permata, C. (2024). Analisis yuridis penerapan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 31 Tahun 2023 tentang ketentuan perizinan usaha PMSE. Journal of Science and Social Research, 7(2), 393–399.
Jened, R. (2017). Hukum merek (trademark law) dalam era global dan integrasi ekonomi. Kencana.
Kennedy, A., & Wartoyo, F. X. (2024). Perlindungan merek dagang pada platform e-commerce di Indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif HAM. JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property, 7(2), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss2.art1
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (n.d.).
kosteve_. (2025, June 6). Perbandingan susu Dancow asli dan palsu [Video]. TikTok. https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS5bHBPDb/
Kurniawan, A., & Rahaditya, R. (2024). Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas merek dalam sengketa merek. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 4(4), 914–921. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2110
Maharani, N. P. C., & Priyanto, I. M. D. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak merek dalam transaksi perdagangan elektronik (e-commerce). Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 10(1).
Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2005). Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 tentang perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual.
Makarim, E. (2022). Tanggung jawab penyelenggara sistem elektronik. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Pangestu, N. P., Wibowo, B. S., Safriawan, M. A., Aqilah, M. A., & Noviyanto. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak merek dan konsumen terhadap barang tiruan di e-commerce. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, 1(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v1i2.727
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik. (2019).
Puspita, Y. B., Saidin, O. K., Leviza, J., & Affila. (2023). Ganti rugi atas penggunaan merek yang memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i3.295
Rahmono, E. B. (2026). Gugatan perdata pelanggaran merek dagang dalam praktik Pengadilan Niaga: Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016. Indonesia of Journal Business Law, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijbl.v5i1.7478
Roebama, K., Syah, D., & Azhari, A. R. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap merek yang sudah terdaftar Cha-Cha milik Jogi Hendra Atmadja: Studi Putusan Nomor 230 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023. Jurnal Hukum Al-Hikmah: Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hukum dan Masyarakat, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.30743/jhah.v5i4.10871
Roji, F. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar dalam mengatasi pelanggaran merek atas transaksi elektronik perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016. Jurnal Notarius, 2(2), 310–325.
Rokan, M. K. (2010). Hukum persaingan usaha. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Santoso, B. (2011). Pengantar hak kekayaan intelektual. Pustaka Magister.
Sativa, A. (2014). Tindak pidana memasukkan keterangan palsu ke dalam akta autentik. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 1(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v1i1.1844
Shopee Indonesia. (n.d.). SAKINAH-OFFICIALSTORE [Shopee store]. Retrieved July 11, 2026, from https://id.shp.ee/tzdgNpA
Sibatuara, E., & Andryawan. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terdaftar di Indonesia: Studi kasus MS Glow versus PS Store Glow. Jurnal Serina Sosial Humaniora, 1(1), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.24912/jssh.v1i1.24550
Sinaga, N. A., & Ferdian, M. (2020). Pelanggaran hak merek yang dilakukan pelaku usaha dalam perdagangan melalui transaksi elektronik (e-commerce). Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 10(2), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.463
Subekti. (2019). Hukum perjanjian. Intermasa.
Suryadi, R. J., & Gultom, E. R. (2023). Analisis hukum terkait melindungi konsumen dalam bertransaksi digital di e-commerce Shopee. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(1), 328–334. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.10933
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2008).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. (2016).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2024).
Wulur, W. N. M., Baftim, F., & Koloay, R. N. S. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang merek terdaftar di Indonesia: Studi kasus Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn. Lex Privatum, 12(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access
LICENSE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
