HUBUNGAN AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN MOTIVASI DENGAN HASIL BELAJAR TAHFIZ AL-QUR'AN (STUDI PADA MTS DARUL QUR'AN DELI SERDANG)

Authors

  • Moncot Moncot

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30821/ansiru.v3i1.5478

Keywords:

Learning Activities, Motivation and Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship of learning and motivationactivities with student learning outcomes in the field of study Tahfiz Al-Qur'an in MTs. Darul Qur'an Deli Serdang Regency. This research isproposed by testing three hypotheses, namely First: There is a relationship of learning activities with student learning outcomes in the field of study Tahfiz Al-Qur'an in MTs. Darul Qur'an Deli Serdang Regency. Second, there is a relationship of learning motivation with student learningoutcomes of tahfiz Qur'an in MTs. Darul Qur'an Deli Serdang Regency.Third, there is a relationship of learning activities and motivation withstudent learning outcomes in the field of study Tahfiz Al-Qur'an in MTs.Darul Qur'an Deli Serdang Regency.The population of this study werestudents of MTs. Darul Qur'an academic year 2017/2018 amounted to 176people. The technique used to determine the sample size is Arikuntoformula. By using the formula, the sample is 30 students. Data collectionfor learning activity variables and learning motivation in this study usinga questionnaire with Likert model scale. While for the variable of studentlearning result of data collecting obtained from document of raport value.Based on the test results on the reliability of these two questionnairevariables obtained the coefficient of reliability as follows: learning activityvariables 0,939 and, Learning motivation variables 0,986. The result of first hypothesis analysis by using correlation technique and regression either simple or multiple obtained ry.1 = 0,392, while R2 y.1 = 0,154. This means that the relationship shown by the variable learning activities with student learning outcomes is strong and very significant. Regression analysis obtained by the equation of simple regression line is Ý = 37,77 + 0.46X1.Results of the second hypothesis analysis show that ry.2 = 0,405., While R2 y.2 = 0,164. This means that the relationship shown by the variablemotivation to learn with student learning outcomes is strong and verysignificant. Regression analysis obtained by the equation of simpleregression line is Ý = 41,29 + 0,18X2. While the third hypothesis shows that ry1.2.3 = 0,501., While Ry1.2.3 = 0,252. Through regression analysis we get the equation of multiple regression line is Ý = 50,42 + 0,36X1 + 0,15X2.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian. Cetakan kesembilanbelas. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

Davies, I.K. (2001). The Management of Learning. Diterjemahkan ke dalam

Bahasa Indonesia oleh Sudarsono Sudirjo dkk. Cetakan Kedua.

Jakarta: Rajawali bekerjasama Dengan Pusat Antar Universitas di

Universitas Terbuka.

Davis, A. G.dan Margaret, A.T. (2009). Sekolah Efektif dan Guru Efektif.

Boston: Allen and Bacon Inc. Disadur oleh Salven Hasri, Makasar:

Yayasan Pendidikan Makasar.

Depdiknas. (2004). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No 22 Tahun

/2008. Jakarta: Depdiknas Dirjend Pendidikan Dasar dan

Menengah.

Djamarah, S.B, dan Zain, A.(2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

E. Koeswara. (2005). Motivasi: Teori dan Penelitiannya. Cetakan kesepuluh.

Bandung: Angkasa.

Gagne, R.M. (2003). Prinsip-Prinsip Belajar Untuk Pengajaran (terjemahan

Abdillah Hanafi). Cetakan kesepuluh. Surabaya: Usaha Offset

Printing.

Gagne, R.M. (2003) The Conditioning of Learning. New-York: Holt, Rinehart

and Winston. Diterjemahkan ke dalam bahasa Indonesia oleh

Hanafi, Situasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Internusa.

Hajar, I. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kuantitatif Dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta:

Raja Grafindo Persada.

Hamalik, O. (2013). Metode Belajar dan Kesulitan-Kesulitan Belajar. Bandung:

Tarsito.

Hergenhahn, B., R dan Olson, Matthew. H. (2008). Theories of Learning.

Edisi Ketujuh. Diterjemahkan ke Dalam Bahasa Indonesia oleh Tri

Bowo BS. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hudoyo, H. (2000). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Malang: IKIP Malang.

Irianto, A. (2012). Statistik: Konsep Dasar, Aplikasi, dan Pengembangannya.

Cetakan kedelapan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nasution, S. (2005). Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar.

Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Novak, JD. dan Gowin, DB. (2005). Learning How to Learn Cambrigde,

Cambrigde University Press.

Ormrod, Jeane Ellis. (2003). Educational Psychology: Developing Leaners.

Fourth Edition. Colombus: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang

Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2005. Jakarta: Diperbanyak oleh

Sinar Grafika.

Prawiradilaga. (2008). Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Universitas

Negeri Jakarta.

Purwanto, N. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan. cetakan kelima. Bandung:

Remaja Rosdakarya.

Reid, G. (2007). Memotivasi Siswa di Kelas: Gagasan dan Strategi. Edisi

bahasa Indonesia, Cetakan kedua. Jakarta.

Richey, R.C; Klein, James D & Nelson, W.A. (2007). Develomental Research:

Studies of Instructional Design and Development. Handbook of

Research for Educational Communication and Technology. New

York: MacMillan Simon & Schuster.

Sanjaya, W. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses

Pendidikan. Cetakan kesepuluh. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Santrock, John. W. (2004). Educational Psychology, 2nd Edition

(diterjemahkan Ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia oleh Tri Wibowo B.S.

Psikologi Pendidikan, Edisi kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sardiman A.M. (2011). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Cetakan

kedua. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Slavin, Robert E. (2004). Educational Psychology: Teory and Practice, Forth

Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Smith, Rick. (2004). Conscious Classroom Management: Unlocking the Secret of

Great Teaching. Calivornia: Belle Avennue.

Uno, H.B. (2011). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Cetakan kedua,

Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-28