Analysis Of The Islamic Legal Paradigm In Studying Monogamy, Polygamy And Divorce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47006/attafahum.v5i1.29056Keywords:
Monogamy, Polygamy, Divorce, Contemporary Jurisprudence.Abstract
This article examines contemporary Islamic legal perspectives on monogamous and polygamous marriages, as well as the processes and underlying reasons for divorce within the framework of modern Islamic jurisprudence. In everyday life, marital relationships frequently encounter various social, economic, and emotional challenges, prompting individuals to navigate between monogamy as the ideal normative model and polygamy as a conditionally permissible practice under sharia. At the same time, divorce emerges as a complex phenomenon influenced by multiple factors, including incompatibility, economic hardship, and moral considerations. The study aims to explore the views, arguments, and proposed solutions of contemporary Islamic scholars in addressing these issues. Employing a qualitative bibliographic approach, this research draws upon classical fiqh literature alongside the interpretations and analyses of modern scholars, thereby bridging traditional doctrines with current socio-cultural realities. This method allows for a comprehensive understanding of how Islamic legal thought evolves in response to changing contexts. The findings reveal that contemporary Islamic law promotes a balanced, just, and context-sensitive approach to marital issues. Monogamy is strongly encouraged as the ideal form of marriage due to its alignment with principles of fairness and stability. Polygamy, while permitted, is strictly regulated and only justified under compelling circumstances, with the absolute requirement of justice among spouses. Furthermore, divorce is regarded as a last resort, permissible only after all efforts toward reconciliation, mediation, and mutual understanding have been thoroughly exhausted.References
Aprillia, Feny Dyah and Vivien Indrawati Setya. (2021). “Komparasi Poligami Dan Monogami Dalam Perspektif HukumIslam,” Ijlil 1, no. 1 February 7: 75–90,
Aprillia, F. D., & Setya, V. I. (2019). Islam. Komparasi Poligami Dan Monogami Perspektif Hukum Islam, 1.
Hafidz, M. (2022). Penerapan Teori Qira’ah Mubadalah Terhadap Analisis Waktu dan Jumlah Dalam Konsep Talak Tiga. Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(April), 23.
Hikmah, S. (2012). Bentuk kekerasan terhadap perempuan. Sawwa, 7(April), 1–20.
Halim, Abdul. (2006). Barkatullah dan Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Islam Menjawab Tantangan Zaman yang Terus Berkembang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Huda, Nadirsyah. (2017). Fiqh Kontemporer: Pemikiran dan Implementasinya dalam Masyarakat Modern Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar
Khalaf, Abdul Wahab. (1955). Fiqh Munakahat. Beirut: Dar Al-fikr
Mashabudin. (2014). Fikih Perkawinan (Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar
Moqsith, Abd. (2015). “Tafsir atas poligami”, KARSA, Vol. 23 No. 1, Juni
Shihab, Quraish. (2007). Hukum Perkawinan Islam Jakarta: Lentera Hati
Zuhra, & Jumhuri. (2018). Konsep Talak Menurut Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah (Analisis Waktu dan Jumlah Penjatuhan Talak). Media Syari’Ah, 20(1), 99–105.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).