The Dynamics of Enforcement of State Administrative Law through the PTUN in Realizing Good Governance in Indonesia

Penulis

  • Khairunnisa Siregar Yogyakarta State University
  • Livia Maylisandi State Islamic University North Sumatra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47006/attafahum.v4i2.29140

Kata Kunci:

State Administrative Law, Law Enforcement, Public Services

Abstrak

The enforcement of state administrative law (PTUN) is a crucial element in realizing good governance and ensuring the implementation of the principles of the rule of law as mandated by the 1945 Constitution. This study aims to analyze in depth the concept of PTUN, its implementation mechanisms, factors that influence its effectiveness, as well as obstacles and innovative solutions in the Indonesian context. A normative juridical approach is used by reviewing legal literature, laws and regulations such as Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning State Administration and Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning PTUN (as amended), as well as state administrative law doctrine. The results of the study reveal that PTUN is not limited to the imposition of administrative sanctions alone, but includes preventive dimensions (prevention through education), corrective (improvement of procedures), and repressive (action through the courts). The main mechanisms include the application of general principles of good governance (AUPB) such as legality, proportionality, and legitimate trust, the legitimate use of discretionary authority, orderly administrative procedures, and legal remedies through the State Administrative Court (PTUN) and supervisory institutions such as the Ombudsman. However, in practice, these challenges face serious obstacles, such as low legal awareness among state civil servants (ASN) and the public, overlapping regulations between laws, a weak internal-external oversight system, and structural corruption that undermines institutional independence. External factors such as disparities in regional resources also exacerbate the situation. Therefore, strategic solutions are proposed in the form of regulatory harmonization through revisions to the omnibus law, increasing ASN professionalism through ongoing training, transparency in public services through digital platforms, and strengthening the role of civil society and the media in participatory oversight. With this implementation, the PTUN is expected to create a transparent, accountable, responsive, and just government, in line with the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045.

Referensi

Arief, A. (2023). Peran Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(4), 789- 812.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2025). Indeks Literasi Hukum Masyarakat Indonesia 2025. Jakarta: Kemenkumham.

Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Huda, M. N. (2021). Digitalisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Peluang dan Tantangan. Jurnal Teknologi Hukum, 9(1), 34-56.

Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2025). Inventarisasi Peraturan Daerah Bermasalah Tahun 2025. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Bina Hukum.

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2025). Laporan Tahunan Indeks Reformasi Birokrasi 2025. Jakarta: KemenPANRB.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2025). Laporan Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Administratif 2025. Jakarta: KPK.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025). Statistik Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Tahun 2025. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Badilag.

Manan, B. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Penghambat Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 7(2), 201-225.

Naibaho, E. P. (2023). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 8(2), 245-267.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2025). Laporan Tahunan Kinerja 2025: Penanganan Aduan Maladministrasi. Jakarta: Ombudsman RI.

Prabowo, H. S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Putusan PTUN. Jurnal Yustisia, 12(1), 89- 112.

Siregar, R. P. (2022). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Negara di Era Digital. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 10(3), 456-478.

Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Stahl, F. J. (1830). Die Philosophie des Rechts. Heidelberg: Mohr. (Edisi referensi Indonesia, 2020).

Suselo, I., & Riyadi, B. S. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara: Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (dengan perubahan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 dan UU No. 11 Tahun 2021).

Wahyudi, A., & Santoso, M. (2024). Harmonisasi Regulasi Hukum Administrasi Negara: Studi Omnibus Law.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2020-09-30

Terbitan

Vol 4 No 2 (2020)

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).