Implementation of the Basic Principles of State Administrative Justice in Ensuring Legal Certainty in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47006/attafahum.v4i1.29348Keywords:
PTUN, Legal Principles, State Of Law, Legal Protection, State AdministrationAbstract
The State Administrative Court (PTUN) plays an important role in the Indonesian legal system as a means of legal protection for the public against government actions. The existence of the PTUN is an implementation of the principles of the rule of law (rechtsstaat) and the rule of law, which emphasizes that every government action must be based on law and can be tested legally. The PTUN was established based on Law Number 5 of 1986 which has been amended through Law Number 9 of 2004 and Law Number 51 of 2009. In its implementation, the PTUN not only functions as an institution for resolving administrative disputes, but also as an instrument for monitoring the actions of public officials to prevent abuse of authority. This paper aims to explain the meaning of the main principles in the PTUN, identify the types of principles that apply, and analyze their application in the practice of state administrative justice. The method used is a normative approach by reviewing laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and related literature. The discussion results show that the basic principles of the PTUN, such as the presumption of justice, the principle of simple, fast, and low-cost justice, the principle of judicial objectivity, and the principle of transparency, play a fundamental role in ensuring justice, legal certainty, and the protection of citizens' rights. In practice, these principles serve as guidelines for examining, adjudicating, and deciding state administrative disputes. Therefore, the application of the basic principles of the PTUN is crucial for the effectiveness of administrative justice in realizing justice and controlling government actions.References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2006). Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Hadjon, Philipus M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Indroharto. (1993). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Kansil, C.S.T. (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Marbun, S.F. (2003). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muchsan. (2007). Sistem Pengawasan terhadap Perbuatan Aparat Pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Soeroso, R. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradila Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
