The Authority of Religious Courts in Resolving Sharia Economic Disputes in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47006/attafahum.v10i1.30962Keywords:
Religious Courts, Sharia Economics, Sharia Economic Disputes, Authority, Dispute Resolution.Abstract
The development of the sharia economy in Indonesia has increased the need for a dispute resolution system that is able to provide legal certainty in accordance with sharia principles. The expansion of the authority of the Religious Courts through amendments to the Religious Courts Law is an important foundation in resolving sharia economic disputes. This research aims to analyze the legal basis of the authority of the Religious Courts in resolving sharia economic disputes and to examine the effectiveness of the implementation of this authority in providing legal protection for the parties. The research uses normative legal research methods with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. Legal materials are obtained through literature studies consisting of laws and regulations, books, scientific journals, and other literature related to sharia economics and Religious Courts. All legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The results of the study show that the authority of the Religious Court in resolving sharia economic disputes has provided legal certainty regarding the institution authorized to adjudicate disputes arising from transactions based on sharia principles. However, the effectiveness of its implementation is still influenced by the quality of human resources, the complexity of sharia economic transactions, and the need for institutional capacity building. Therefore, strengthening the competence of judges, optimizing mediation mechanisms, and improving coordination between institutions is an important step in increasing the effectiveness of resolving sharia economic disputes through the Religious Court. Thus, the Religious Court has a strategic role in supporting the development of the sharia economy and providing legal certainty for the community.References
Abdul Manan. (2007). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Sebuah Kewenangan Baru Peradilan Agama. Makalah Dies Natalis Universitas YARSI, Jakarta.
Abdurrahman. (2008). Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Emirzon, Joni. (2001). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Manan, Abdul. (2005). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mujahidin, Ahmad. (2008). Prosedur Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Taufiq. (2007). Sumber Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Dalam Abdul Manan, Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Sebuah Kewenangan Baru Peradilan Agama. Makalah Dies Natalis Universitas YARSI, Jakarta.
Zarqa, Musthafa Ahmad. (1988). Al-Fi'il al-Dharr wa al-Dhaman Fih. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).