Analysis of Religious Court Judges' Decisions Class IA City Of Medan: Case Study Of Marriage Confirmation Case Reg Number: 51/Pdt.P/2015/PA Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47006/attafahum.v1i1.672Keywords:
Islamic Law, Judge's Decision, Guardian Judge, Marriage ConfirmationAbstract
This study starts from a decision of a judge of the Class IA Religious Court of Medan City who accepted and determined the application for Marriage Confirmation registered by Applicant I and Applicant II on behalf of Arifin bin Mhd Isya and Dahniar binti Burhanuddin who were married by the Judge Guardian on behalf of Anwar who in this case has the status of Assistant Marriage Registrar (P3N), then the decision issued by the judge of the Class IA Religious Court of Medan City on the application for Marriage Confirmation submitted by the applicant is legally flawed, because the judge did not take the PMA RI as a consideration, the judge only used the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 3 of 2014 as a consideration where the Religious Court can validate the application for Marriage Confirmation submitted with the consideration of providing facilities to the applicant so that they can complete the population administration and civil registration which ultimately ignores the order of Law Number 1 of 1974 which mandates the Ministry of Religion to register marriages as well as to regulate marriage requirements where the position of the marriage guardian is a very urgent position in a marriage.References
Abdul Kadir Muhammad. (1992). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Cet. V Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
Abdul Manan. (2006). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Linkungan Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
Hasbullah Bakri. (1985). Kumpulan Lengkap Undang-undang dan Peraturan Perkawinan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Terbitan Jambatan
Lilik Mulyadi. (2002). Putusan Hakim dan Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta: Citra Grafika
M. Nur Rasaid. (2003). Hukum Acara Perdata, Cet. III Jakarta : Sinar Grafika Offset
M. Yahya Harahap, Kedudukan Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama, UU No. 7 Tahun 1989, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Moh. Taufik Makarao. (2001). Pokok–pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Muchsin. (2004). Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang Merdeka dan Kebijakan Asasi, Jakarta: STIH IBLAM
Riduan Syahrani. (1998). Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Umum, Cet. I Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini
Roihan A Rasjid. (1991). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Sudarsono. (1992). Pokok-pokok Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta
Sudikno Mertokusumo. (2003). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: LIBERTY
Sulaikin Lubis, Wismar ‘Ain Marzuki dan Gemala Dewi. (2008). Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana
Zaenuddin Ali. (2006). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
