PENILAIAN PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN TERHADAP KINERJA GURU YANG BERSERTIFIKAT PENDIDIK PROFESIONAL

Authors

  • Rahmadiah Siregar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30821/benchmarking.v2i2.6935

Keywords:

Kinerja, Stakeholder, Profesional

Abstract

Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya penilaian stakeholder terhadapkinerja guru bersertifikat pendidik 25,5 % sangat baik; 54,96 % baik pada setiapkompetensi (pedagogi, profesional, kepribadian dan sosial. Sedangkan penilaian dariKomite Sekolah adalah 31,8% sangat baik; 52,2% baik. Kesimpulanya adalahsertifikasi sangat baik untuk memajukan guru menjadi guru professional. Saranyang diberikan adalah proses sertifikasi ini dilanjutkan sehingga semua gurumemperoleh kesempatan untuk menjadi guru profesional.

References

Arifin, I. 2000. Profesionalisme Guru: Analisis Wacana Reformasi Pendidikan dalam

Era Globalisasi. Simposium Nasional Pendidikan di Universitas Muhammadiyah

Malang

Centre for Civic Education, 1994, National Standards for Civics and Government,

California: Centre for Civic Education.

CSES Working Paper Series Paper 4 Ithaca, NY: Cornell University

Depdikbud. 1994. Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Umum. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Depdiknas. 2004. Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Elliot Turiel.2002. The Culture of Morality: Sosial Development, Context, and

Conflict.

Faturidiman dan Agus Dwiyanto, 2001. Reorientasi Kebijakan Kependudukan,

Yoyakarta, PKK UGM.

ILO. 2004. "Gender and Poverty", A Series of Policy Recommendations Decent Work

and Poverty Reduction in Indonesia. Jakarta.

Jain, A K.2001.Ecology and Natural Resource Management For Sustainable

Development. New Delhi: Management Publishing Co.

Jalal, Fasli dan Dedi Supriadi. 2001. Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Konteks Otonomi

Daerah.Yogyakarta: Adicita Karya Nusa.

Jim Ife. 2002. Community Development: Community Based Alternatives in Age of

Globalization.2nd Edition. Frenchs Forest NSW: Longman (pp.180-225)

Johnson, Doyle Paul. 1994. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Terjemahan Robert

MZ. Lawang. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

June R. Chapin. 1994. Elementary Sosial Studies: A Practical Guide. New York:

Longman.

Kahn, James R. 2005. The Economic Approach to Environmental Natural Resources.

rd Edn. Thomson-South-western.

Long, Norman and Ann Long (Ed.) 1992. Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking

of Theory and Practice in Sosial Research and Development. London, New York:

Long Martinussen, John. 1997.SOCIETY, STATE, & MARKET: A Guide.

Muhadjir , Noeng. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Nee, Victor. 2003. The New Institutionalism in Economics and Sociology.

Partha Dasgupta and Ismail Serageldin. 1999, Sosial Capital : A Multifaceted

Perspective, Washington D.C: The World Bank Sumantri, Muhammad Numan,

, Menggagas Pembaharuan Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial,

Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tilaar, H.A.R. dan Riant Nugroho. 2008. Kebijakan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka

Pelajar

UNDP, 2005. The

Indonesia MDGs Report 2005.

(http:/

/undp.or.id/pubs/imdg2005/).

USAID 2007. Seri Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. Website: www.lgsp.or.id

Downloads

Published

2018-02-20

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): BENCHMARKING

Section

Artcles

License

This journal charges the following author fees (Starting from the December 2025 Issue):

- Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
- Authors are required to pay an Article Processing Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.

- Article Processing Fee: 1,500,000 (IDR)

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Processing Fee to cover publication costs.