Legal Status of Social Inquiry Reports in Juvenile Sentencing under the Best Interests of the Child Principle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.28463Keywords:
Best interests of the child, Juvenile justice, Judicial reasoning, Social inquiry report, SentencingAbstract
Juvenile sentencing is designed to reflect the principles of protection, rehabilitation, and the best interests of the child. In Indonesia, Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System requires judges to consider Social Inquiry Reports (Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan or Litmas) prior to imposing sentences on children. This article examines the legal status of Social Inquiry Reports and clarifies the normative meaning of the obligation to consider them within judicial reasoning. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study analyzes relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and selected juvenile court decisions. The findings indicate that Social Inquiry Reports function as non-juridical instruments intended to support individualized sentencing rather than as binding recommendations. Judicial practice, however, demonstrates varying degrees of engagement with these reports, ranging from formal reference to substantive consideration. This article concludes that interpreting the obligation to consider Social Inquiry Reports as a substantive and argumentative duty enhances the application of the best interests of the child principle while preserving judicial independence in juvenile sentencing. By framing Article 60(3) as a reason-giving duty, this article offers an operational standard for assessing whether judges meaningfully engage with Litmas in their sentencing reasons, thereby enriching the discussion on individualized juvenile sentencing.References
Arief, B. N. (2016). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenada Media.
Arif, M. Y. al. (2019). Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.1.169-192
Ashworth, A., & Horder, J. (2013). Principles of Criminal Law. OUP Oxford.
Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2007). Children’s Rights in Juvenile Justice: General Comment No. 10 (CRC/C/GC/10) (CRC/C/GC/10). United Nations, Committee on the Rights of the Child. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2022-12/childrensrightsinjuvenilejustice_crc.c.gc_.10_25april2007_en.pdf
Hamzah, A., & Surachman, R. M. (2015). Pre-Trial Justice & Discretionary Justice dalam KUHAP berbagai Negara. Sinar Grafika.
Harini, M., & Rahmat, D. (2025). Peran Hakim Pada Proses Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Kode Etik Hakim. Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1097
Hutasoit, E. L., Siagian, F. J. C., Zulkifli, S., & Noor, T. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Anak Luar Nikah di Indonesia; Studi Komparasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dan Hukum Islam. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 16(2), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.8938
Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. CREPIDO, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22
Krisna, L. A. (2015). Hasil Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Pengadilan Anak. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 10(1), 146–158.
Kuncoro, S. I., Susanti, S. S., Selamat, S., & Jiwantara, F. A. (2023). BASIS NILAI PENALARAN HUKUM NON-SISTEMIK DALAM KERANGKA DIALEKTIKA PENALARAN HUKUM SISTEMIK KE ARAH PENALARAN HUKUM NON SISTEMIK. ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 1(6), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v1i6.602
Langer, M. (2024). Plea bargaining as second-best criminal adjudication and the future of criminal procedure thought in global perspective. In Research Handbook on Plea Bargaining and Criminal Justice (pp. 552–574). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781802206678/book-part-9781802206678-43.xml
Marlina. (2009). Peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan konsep diversi dan restorative justice. Refika Aditama.
McDermott, Y. (2016). Fairness in International Criminal Trials. Oxford University Press.
Monaghan, N. (2015). Law of Evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Nurisman, E. (2022). Risalah Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Pasca Lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.170-196
Riza, F., & Sibarani, F. A. (2021). Prinsip The Best Interest of The Child dalam Proses Peradilan Anak. umsu press.
Saputra, F. J., Sirajuddin, & Supardi. (2024). Fungsi dan Tugas Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah. Journal of Sharia and Legal Science, 2(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v2i2.409
Sumardi, D., Mansari, M., & Albaba, M. F. (2022). Restoratif Justice, Diversi dan Peradilan Anak Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 110/Puu-X/2012. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 11(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v11i2.16010
Tampubolon, S. S., Siregar, A. R. M., & Simbolon, T. (2026). Penemuan Hukum dan Penalaran Hukum Sebagai Dasar Pembentukan Putusan Hakim yang Berkeadilan. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1), 1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.3321
Waluyo, B. (2022). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
