Meaning of Unlawful and Unjust Termination of Employment in Labor Law: A Perspective from International Law and National Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.29741Keywords:
industrial relations dispute, legal protection, remedial justice, unlawful termination, workers’ rightsAbstract
This article examines the legal protection and justice for workers/laborers for unlawful termination of employment through a comparison between Indonesian labor law and international labor law standards. The main problem lies in the absence of an explicit normative definition of unlawful layoffs and the absence of a special compensation standard for workers/laborers who are terminated without valid reasons or without proper procedures. This study uses normative legal research methods with legislative, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. The analysis focused on Indonesia's labor regulations, industrial relations dispute resolution mechanisms, the Government Regulation on layoffs, ILO Convention No. 158, the discourse on international labor rights, and court rulings related to unlawful layoffs. The results of the study show that Indonesian law has regulated layoff procedures and workers' rights, but has not explicitly distinguished between legal layoffs and unlawful layoffs as a separate legal category. In contrast, international labor law emphasizes the principles of legitimate cause, fair procedure, human dignity, and effective remedies as the standard of protection against unjust layoffs. This article argues that unlawful layoffs need to be constructed as a specific violation of a law that demands restorative justice, certainty of compensation, and access to effective dispute resolution.References
Alston, P. (2004). Core labour standards and the transformation of the international labour rights regime. European Journal of International Law, 15(3), 457–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.3.457
Alston, P. (2005). Facing up to the complexities of the ILO’s core labour standards agenda. European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi126
Auray, S., Danthine, S., & Poschke, M. (2020). Understanding the determination of severance pay: Mandates, bargaining, and unions. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1073–1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12367
Bogg, A. L. (2012). Sham self-employment in the Supreme Court. Industrial Law Journal, 41(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dws021
Busby, N., & McDermont, M. (2020). Fighting with the wind: Claimants’ experiences and perceptions of the employment tribunal. Industrial Law Journal, 49(2), 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwz018
Collins, H. (2021). An emerging human right to protection against unjustified dismissal. Industrial Law Journal, 50(1), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa003
Collins, H. (2023). Relational and associational justice in work. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 24(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2023-0004
Collins, P. M. (2018). The inadequate protection of human rights in unfair dismissal law. Industrial Law Journal, 47(4), 504–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwx026
Collins, P. M. (2022). Finding fault in the law of unfair dismissal: The insubstantiality of reasons for dismissal. Industrial Law Journal, 51(3), 598–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab018
Davidov, G. (2016). A purposive approach to labour law. Oxford University Press.
Davidov, G. (2025). A theory of the contract of employment. Industrial Law Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwaf031
Dukes, R. (2017). International labour rights: Legitimizing the international legal order? University of Toronto Law Journal, 67(4), 544–568. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.67.4
Eguchi, K. (2008). Damages or reinstatement: Incentives and remedies for unjust dismissal. Review of Law & Economics, 4(1), 443–474. https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1169
Ford, M. (2018). Employment tribunal fees and the rule of law: R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor in the Supreme Court. Industrial Law Journal, 47(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwx032
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law (Rev. ed.). Yale University Press.
International Labour Organization. (1982). Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (No. 158). International Labour Organization.
Langille, B. A. (2005). Core labour rights: The true story (Reply to Alston). European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 409–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi124
Mantouvalou, V. (2012). Are labour rights human rights? European Labour Law Journal, 3(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/201395251200300204
Mantouvalou, V. (2013). Labour rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An intellectual justification for an integrated approach to interpretation. Human Rights Law Review, 13(3), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngt001
Papadopoulos, N. A. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of the European Social Charter: A case study on dismissal reforms. European Papers, 7(3), 1345–1374. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/628
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.
Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.
Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang.
Robin-Olivier, S. (2020). The relationship between international law and European labour legislation and its impact on the development of international and European social law. International Labour Review, 159(4), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12195
Schmitt, M., & Rocca, M. (2022). A new source for (EU) labour law? European Labour Law Journal, 13(2), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525221093510
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.