Vagueness of Article 271 of the Indonesian National Criminal Code on Necrophilia as an Uncivilized Act Against Corpses

Authors

  • Andika Dian Tetuko Master of Law, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Nurini Aprilianda Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia
  • Lucky Endrawati Faculty of Law, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v10i2.31133

Keywords:

corpse dignity, criminal law reform, legal certainty, necrophilia, principle of legality

Abstract

This article examines the vagueness of Article 271 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian National Criminal Code in relation to necrophilia as an uncivilized act against corpses. The main problem lies in the open-ended phrase “treating a corpse in an uncivilized manner,” which does not explicitly clarify whether sexual acts against a corpse fall within its scope. This study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. The analysis focuses on the National Criminal Code, the principle of legality, the lex certa requirement, the Mojokerto case, and comparative models from England and Wales, the United States, and India. The study finds that Article 271 provides an initial normative basis for protecting corpses, but its vague formulation may create uncertainty in prosecution, evidentiary construction, and judicial interpretation. This article argues that necrophilia should be regulated more explicitly as a sexual act against a corpse, either through an additional provision under Article 271 or through a separate offence. Such regulation is necessary to protect human dignity after death while maintaining legal certainty and limiting excessive interpretation in criminal law enforcement.

References

Ali, M. (2010). Pencemaran nama baik melalui sarana informasi dan transaksi elektronik: Kajian Putusan MK No. 2/PUU-VII/2009. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk765

Aryanto, F. D. (2018). Perspektif mayat/jenazah dalam hukum pidana dan perdata. Lontar Merah, 1(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.31002/lm.v1i1.241

Batubara, S. A., Tanwin, M. A., & Anggadinata, Y. F. (2021). Transplantasi organ tubuh pada mayat perspektif hukum positif Indonesia. DIVERSI: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v7i1.1464

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, § 301. (India).

California Health and Safety Code § 7052. (2025).

Candra, S. (2013). Pembaharuan hukum pidana: Konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam hukum pidana nasional yang akan datang. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i1.2979

Christianto, H. (2011). Konsep hak seseorang atas tubuh dalam transplantasi organ berdasarkan nilai kemanusiaan. Mimbar Hukum, 23(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16195

Florida Statutes § 872.06. (2025). Abuse of a dead human body; penalty.

Hanafi. (2019). Landasan filosofis kebijakan formulasi kejahatan terhadap jenazah dalam Pasal 180 KUHP. Voice Justisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 3(1), 73–95.

Indonesia. (2022). Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 120 of 2022.

Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2023.

Latif, A. (2010). Tafsir hakim terhadap unsur melawan hukum pasca Putusan MK atas pengujian UU PTPK. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(3), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk732

Mahadnyani, T. M. A., & Wirya Darma, I. M. (2025). Breaking the silence: Necrophilia in Indonesia and the pressing demand for legal reform. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 25(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2025.25.1.15467

Marasabessy, S., Hehanussa, D. J. A., & Tuhumury, C. (2024). Penegakan hukum pidana terhadap perbuatan cabul bagi mayat: Studi Putusan Nomor 62/PID.B/2020/PN.BNR. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 2(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v2i1.13869

Marbun, R. (2014). Grand design politik hukum pidana dan sistem hukum pidana Indonesia berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(3), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a8

Putri, N. S. (2021). Memikirkan kembali unsur “hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat” dalam Pasal 2 RKUHP ditinjau perspektif asas legalitas. Indonesia Criminal Law Review, 1(1), 60–72.

Riyanto, H. R. B. (2020). Pembaruan hukum nasional era 4.0. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.455

Satria, H. (2016). Menakar perlindungan justice collaborator: Quo vadis justice collaborator. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(2), 431–454.

Sexual Offences Act 2003, c. 42, § 70. (United Kingdom).

Suartha, I. D. M. (2015). Pergeseran asas legalitas formal ke formal dan material dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana nasional. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8640

Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Contempt of court dalam perspektif hukum progresif: Analisis Putusan Nomor 241/Pid.B/2006/PN.PWK. Jurnal Yudisial, 9(2), 151–171.

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Widowati, & Ohoiwutun, Y. A. T. (2021). Kepastian hukum putusan yang melanggar special straf maxima: Kajian Putusan Nomor 306/Pid.B/2017/PN.Smd. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(1), 1–18.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Inpress

Section

Manuscript

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.