Voltaire’s Ambivalent Representation of Islam: An Intellectual History Analysis of the XVIII Century Enlightenment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30829/juspi.v10i1.30320Keywords:
Voltaire, Islam, Ambivalence, Intellectual historyAbstract
Voltaire’s critical stance toward religion constitutes a controversial discourse within Enlightenment intellectual history, particularly regarding his satirical critiques of religious dogma and clerical institutions. However, his position on Islam reveals a unique, non-monolithic characteristic that has rarely been examined as a central theme in Voltaire scholarship. Utilizing the Historical method with an Intellectual History approach, this study conducts a descriptive textual analysis by identifying, classifying, and synthesizing textual representations of Voltaire’s ambivalence toward Islam across his corpus within the eighteenth-century intellectual context. The findings indicate that critique and appreciation coexisted simultaneously without a linear chronology, showing no significant shift in his attitude throughout his career. This study challenges previous discourses that have tended to position Voltaire within a dichotomous or chronological framework, offering a more nuanced analytical model that enriches Voltaire scholarship and intellectual history by showing how conflicting representations coexist within a single corpus.References
Anonymous. (1846). The Book of the Three Impostors (J. Myles, Trans.). Amsterdam: G.Vale.
Baggio, G. (2019). Razinsky Hili, Ambivalence. A Philosophical Exploration. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XI(2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1736
Berkhofer, R. F. (1997). Beyond the great story: History as text and discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Betts, C. J. (1984). Early deism in France (P. Dibon & R. Popkin, Eds.). Boston, The Hague, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Bevilacqua, A. (2018). The republic of Arabic letters: Islam and the European Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24trd01
Burton, H. (2013). The Fanaticism, or Mahomet the prophet. In H. Burton & M. Ruthven (Eds.), Le Fanatisme, ou Mahomet le Prophète (pp. 4–15). Sacramento: Litwin Books, LLC. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/fanaticismormaho0000volt/page/18/mode/2up?view=theater
Cami, E. (2013). Moments of Islamic and Orientalist Discourse in the Anticlerical Perspective of Voltaire. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n2p515
Coller, I. (2014). Rousseau’s turban: Entangled encounters of Europe and Islam in the age of enlightenment. Historical Reflections, 40(2), pp. 56–77. https://doi.org/10.3167/hrrh.2014.400204
Collini, S. (1985, October 10). What is intellectual history. History Today, 35(10). Retrieved from https://www.historytoday.com/archive/what-intellectual-history
Durant, W. (1965). The story of civilization IX: The age of Voltaire. New York: Simon and Schuster. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/TheStoryOfCivilizationcomplete/Durant_Will_-_The_story_of_civilization_1/
Eigenauer, J. D. (2018). Alexander Bevilacqua, The Republic of Arabic Letters: Islam and the European Enlightenment Pp. 360. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 52(1), pp. 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.2018.0030
Haciismailoğlu, M. İ. (2020). Osmanlı Müelliflerinin Çalışmalarında Zeyd-Zeyneb Hadisesi Bağlamında Voltaire’in “Fanatizm veya Peygamber Muhammed’in Bağnazlığı” Adlı Tiyatro Eseri Üzerine Değerlendirmeler. Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.14395/hititilahiyat.689001
Hodge, K. S. (2022). Hili Razinsky: Ambivalence: A Philosophical Exploration. Human Studies, 45(1), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09619-5
Lavaert, S. (2019). The Traite des trois imposteurs: A philosophical plot, or (re)translation as strategy of enlightenment. Cadernos de Tradução, 39(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2019v39n1p73
Perakslis, C. (2020, September 1). Technology valence-carriers and ambivalence tolerance. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 39(3), p. 100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2020.3012335
Salda, M. I., Rijal, S., & HM. Yasin, T. (2022). Perseteruan Voltaire terhadap Islam dan Nabi Muhammad. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22373/jpi.v2i1.12854
Thohir, A., & Sahidin, A. (2019). Filsafat sejarah: Profetik, Spekulatif, dan Kritis. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Voltaire. (1743). Le fanatisme, ou Mahomet le prophète , tragédie (First). Paris: Estienne Ledet & Company. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/lefanatismeouma01voltgoog
Voltaire. (1764). Dictionnaire Philosophique. Geneva: Gabriel Grasset. Retrieved from http://books.google.com
Voltaire. (1769). Épître à l’Auteur du Livre des Trois Imposteurs (Œuvres complètes; L. Moland, Ed.). Paris: Garnier.
Voltaire. (1835). Essai sur les mœurs et l’esprit des nations (1835 Edition; Q. Beuchot, Ed.). Paris: Treuttel et Würtz. Retrieved from http://books.google.com
Voltaire. (1865). Correspondance Complete. Paris: Impremeur de l’empereur. Retrieved from http://books.google.com
Voltaire. (1878). Lettres d’Amabed. Paris: Librairie des Bibliophiles.
Voltaire. (1879). Œuvres complètes de Voltaire (L. Moland, Ed.). Paris: Garnier.
Voltaire. (1880). Le dîner du comte de Boulainvilliers : suivi de l’Empereur de la Chine et le frère Rigolet, ou, Relation de l’expulsion des Jésuites de la Chine. Paris: I. Liseux.
Voltaire. (1917). Lettres Philosophiques (Deuxième). Paris: Librairie Hachette.
Voltaire. (1918). Candide ou l’Optimisme (1918th ed.; W. Fleming, Trans.). New York: BONI AND LIVERIGHT, INC.
Voltaire. (1921). Candide ou l’Optimisme. Paris: Jules Tallandier. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/details/candideouloptimiOOvolt
Voltaire. (2001). Lettres Philosophiques. New York: Open Library : Blackmask Online. Retrieved from http://www.blackmask.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Statement
1. Author(s)'s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third-party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
2. Right of Authors
JUSPI allows the author(s) to hold the copyright. Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights:
- Reproduce the work.
- Prepare derivative works based on the work.
- Distribute copies of the work.
- Perform the work publicly.
- Display the work publicly.
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights.
- The right to self-archive the article (please read our Repository Policy).
- The right to enter separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (JUSPI).
3. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. JUSPI will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. JUSPI will only communicate with the corresponding author.
4. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by JUSPI.
5. User/Public Right
JUSPI's spirit is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, JUSPI permits users to share, copy, redistribute, display, and perform the material in any medium or format. Adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Users will also need to attribute authors and JUSPI to distributing works in the journal and other media of publication.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
