Implementasi Manajemen Administrasi Pimpinan Wilayah Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara terhadap Efektivitas Organisasi

Penulis

  • Mutholib Mutholib Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30829/ajei.v0i1.29926

Kata Kunci:

Manajemen Administrasi, Efektivitas Organisasi, Muhammadiyah, Pengembangan Kapasitas, Organisasi Islam

Abstrak

Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi manajemen administrasi Pimpinan Wilayah Muhammadiyah (PWM) Sumatera Utara dan dampaknya terhadap efektivitas organisasi. Penelitian menggunakan desain mixed methods konvergen paralel yang memadukan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui kuesioner terstruktur berbasis sensus dan pendekatan kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam, focus group discussion (FGD), serta analisis dokumen organisasi. Populasi sasaran adalah seluruh Ketua Pimpinan Daerah Muhammadiyah (PDM) se-Sumatera Utara, dengan 16 responden yang berhasil memberikan data lengkap. Enam dimensi dianalisis: Perencanaan Strategis Administrasi (PS), Pengorganisasian Sumber Daya (PO), Sistem Pengendalian dan Pelaporan (SP), Komunikasi dan Koordinasi Kelembagaan (KK), Kapasitas Sumber Daya Manusia Administrasi (KS), dan Efektivitas Organisasi (EO). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kinerja manajemen administrasi yang tinggi secara keseluruhan dengan rerata total 4,42 (SB = 0,63). Komunikasi dan Koordinasi Kelembagaan merupakan dimensi dengan skor tertinggi (M = 4,53; kategori Sangat Baik), sementara Kapasitas SDM Administrasi merupakan dimensi dengan skor relatif terendah (M = 4,20; kategori Sangat Baik). Seluruh dimensi menunjukkan reliabilitas internal yang sangat andal (Cronbach's α = 0,81–0,95). Analisis korelasi Pearson menunjukkan bahwa kelima dimensi manajemen administrasi berkorelasi signifikan dan positif dengan efektivitas organisasi (r = 0,72–0,86, p < 0,01). Analisis regresi berganda menghasilkan koefisien determinasi R² = 0,862, artinya kelima dimensi secara bersama-sama menjelaskan 86,2% varian efektivitas organisasi. Dimensi KK (β = 0,686) merupakan prediktor terkuat. Temuan kualitatif menguatkan hasil kuantitatif dengan mengidentifikasi kesenjangan digitalisasi, keterbatasan pelatihan SDM, serta inkonsistensi SOP sebagai agenda perbaikan prioritas. Diusulkan Kerangka Peningkatan Manajemen Administrasi Strategis (KPMAS) berlandaskan tiga pilar: pengembangan modal manusia, transformasi administrasi digital, dan standardisasi tata kelola, yang semuanya diintegrasikan dalam kerangka nilai-nilai Islam (amanah, syura, mas'uliyah).

Referensi

Apriantoro, M. S., & Susanto, I. W. (2024). Exploring the landscape of Islamic management research through bibliometric analysis: Insights and implications. Contemporary Management Research, 20(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.23460

Berrett, J. L. (2022). Linking overhead expenses and nonprofit effectiveness: Evidence from Habitat for Humanity. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 32(4), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21492

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Burhani, A. N. (2023). Muhammadiyah berkemajuan: Revitalisasi gerakan Islam modernis Indonesia. Mizan.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daft, R. L. (2021). Organization theory and design (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale [Administrasi industri dan umum]. Dunod.

Feng, N. C., & Greenlee, J. S. (2024). Governance, performance, and compensation in nonprofit organizations: A review of recent empirical nonprofit research. Journal of Governmental & Nonprofit Accounting, 13(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/JOGNA-2023-006

Gazley, B., & Guo, C. (2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(2), 211–232.

Haedar, N. (2022). Revitalisasi gerakan Muhammadiyah di abad kedua. Suara Muhammadiyah.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Husna, A., Siregar, S., & Lubis, F. A. (2025). Prevention of fraud: Using the concept of Istikhlaf approach for public accountants. Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 9(1), 30-43.

Iskandarova, M., & Sloan, P. (2023). Digital transformation in nonprofit organizations: Enablers, barriers, and outcomes. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(3), 512–528.

Karimah, F., Fauzi, A., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Implementasi manajemen mutu berbasis nilai di sekolah Muhammadiyah: Studi kasus peningkatan efisiensi operasional. Tarbiyah Journal, 12(1), 45–62.

Mintzberg, H. (2023). Management: It's not what you think. Strategic Management Journal, 44(3), 451–468.

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053.

Munzoori, A., Khan, M. A., Chaudhry, S. A., & Khan, S. (2021). Unity of command in Islamic organizational management: A comparative analysis. Management Science, 67(4), 321–335.

Nordin, N., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2022). Nonprofit capacity and social performance: Mapping the field and future directions. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 171–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00297-2

Nordin, N., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2024). Institutional capacity and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations: A systematic review. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(2), 234–258.

Rehman, A., & Hameed, S. (2024). Resilience through ethical leadership: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Research, 18(1), 99–112.

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-06-24

Terbitan

Jurnal At-Tawassuth | Vol. XI | No. 1 | 2026

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.